The Hidden Link Between Fraud and Workplace Accidents
Have you ever wondered what drives an otherwise honest employee to steal, or a careful worker to ignore a critical safety rule? While the consequences are vastly different, the underlying human behaviors are surprisingly identical. Like many things in the "non-EHS" world, there is often a connection. Let's consider the connection between the "Fraud Triangle" and workplace accidents.
Bad choices in both arenas rarely happen in a vacuum. Both fraud and unsafe acts occur when a perfect storm of three elements exists: Pressure, Opportunity, and Rationalization. Let's be clear - this is not about blaming employees in any way but only meant to highlight how some of the psychology behind fraud may also be connected to poor choices that lead to poor safety outcomes.
The Fraud Triangle Originally developed by Donald Cressey, the Fraud Triangle shows that workplace theft is usually not just about greed but about a situation. Fraud occurs when all three of these conditions are met:
- Pressure: The individual is facing personal or financial stressors, such as debt, lifestyle demands, or other financial problems.
- Opportunity: The workplace provides a way to commit the act through weak controls, lack of supervision, missing audits, or unchecked access to assets.
- Rationalization: The person justifies their behavior to themselves with thoughts like, "I deserve it," "I'll pay it back," or "No one will get hurt".
Interestingly, we can apply those exact same dynamics to workplace safety. When workers take dangerous shortcuts, it is rarely because they simply don't care; it is usually driven by the environment. An unsafe act can occur when these three factors align:
- Pressure: Workplace demands push people toward shortcuts. This can look like tight production deadlines, time pressure, fatigue, staffing shortages, or even just wanting to "help the team".
- Opportunity: The system allows for unsafe behavior due to missing safeguards, weak procedures, a poor reporting culture, or inconsistent enforcement.
- Rationalization: The worker justifies the risk, thinking, "I've done it this way for years," "It won't happen to me," or "We need to get the job done".
Whether it’s an employee embezzling funds or a worker taking a shortcut, the root causes share the same human dynamics. By recognizing how pressure, opportunity, and rationalization fuel bad decisions, organizations can better understand these situations and proactively fix the systemic issues such as weak controls and high-stress deadlines, before they lead to disastrous consequences.
Leave a comment
Comments will be approved before showing up.
